Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1114 [SLACK_001328] · slack_pm:msg:11628

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

She's an idiot - if you read PO1 it's clear that lab origin is still on the table.

Extracted statements

Rule-extracted, not adjudicated. The grade says what may be done with each one; read the document above before relying on any of them.

Statement	Grade	Attribution	Stance
She's an idiot - if you read PO1 it's clear that lab origin is still on the table.	own voice, substantive	speaker_own	asserts

Statement

Grade

Attribution

Stance

She's an idiot - if you read PO1 it's clear that lab origin is still on the table.

own voice, substantive

speaker_own

asserts

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2022-05-27 12:30 Edward C. Holmes open

Did you get that one? She attacked a ton on FOIA docs which largely having nothing to do with us.
2022-05-27 12:31 Edward C. Holmes open

Straight to the bin.
2022-05-27 12:32 Edward C. Holmes open

shared file(s): 2021.05.12 DO NOT RELEASE 21-018_Part I.pdf
2022-05-27 12:33 Edward C. Holmes open

Obvious what their story will say.
2022-05-27 12:33 Robert F. Garry

She's an idiot - if you read PO1 it's clear that lab origin is still on the table.
2022-05-27 12:34 Edward C. Holmes open

Definitely an idiot.
2022-05-27 12:35 Robert F. Garry open

how many times is it necessary to explain that we examined everything agnostically?
2022-05-27 12:36 Kristian G. Andersen open

Lol - no, I didn't receive anything. It appears Emily never read our paper, nor does she understand the concept of a"draft". Back to school, Emily - then try again.
2022-05-27 12:37 Robert F. Garry open

the dimmest bulb...