Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, pp.1114-1115 [SLACK_001328] · slack_pm:msg:11630

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

how many times is it necessary to explain that we examined everything agnostically?

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2022-05-27 12:32 Edward C. Holmes open

shared file(s): 2021.05.12 DO NOT RELEASE 21-018_Part I.pdf
2022-05-27 12:33 Edward C. Holmes open

Obvious what their story will say.
2022-05-27 12:33 Robert F. Garry open

She's an idiot - if you read PO1 it's clear that lab origin is still on the table.
2022-05-27 12:34 Edward C. Holmes open

Definitely an idiot.
2022-05-27 12:35 Robert F. Garry

how many times is it necessary to explain that we examined everything agnostically?
2022-05-27 12:36 Kristian G. Andersen open

Lol - no, I didn't receive anything. It appears Emily never read our paper, nor does she understand the concept of a"draft". Back to school, Emily - then try again.
2022-05-27 12:37 Robert F. Garry open

the dimmest bulb...
2022-05-27 12:37 Kristian G. Andersen open

Not even dim - it's not on at all. Hilarious, really.
2022-05-27 12:38 Edward C. Holmes open

I can see the headline "Draft Proximal Origins paper was not finalized". Damming.