Chat message

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

1. 2022-05-27 12:29 Edward C. Holmes open
   Dr. Holmes, Reaching out with U.S. Right to Know in Washington for comment about an email we obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request (see attached). It suggests that all theories about the origins of COVID were still on the table for you and Dr. Farrar as late as Feb. 8, 2020.As we understand it, that's four days after an early version of your highly influential paper "The Proximal origin ofCOVID-19" was shared with<https://protect-au.mimecast.com/s/ZvyUCgZ0N1ilmEwRMuNqUhs?domain=dropbox.com> Anthony Fauci. Could you help me understand why it seems that a paper dismissing the possibility of a lab accident was draftedbefore you and your collaborators had reached a firm conclusion? And could you please share the summary of your discussions as of Feb. 8 that is referenced here (it's redacted inour docs)? All of the docs we received via this FOIA request are attached for your verification.We're hoping to get this story up in the next couple of hours (EST), but I know it's very early in Australia so please letme know ASAP if you plan on commenting and need more time to reply. And we are happy to add comment after the story is live. Thanks so much,--Emily Kopp
2. 2022-05-27 12:30 Edward C. Holmes open
   Did you get that one? She attacked a ton on FOIA docs which largely having nothing to do with us.
3. 2022-05-27 12:31 Edward C. Holmes
   Straight to the bin.
4. 2022-05-27 12:32 Edward C. Holmes open
   shared file(s): 2021.05.12 DO NOT RELEASE 21-018_Part I.pdf
5. 2022-05-27 12:33 Edward C. Holmes open
   Obvious what their story will say.
6. 2022-05-27 12:33 Robert F. Garry open
   She's an idiot - if you read PO1 it's clear that lab origin is still on the table.
7. 2022-05-27 12:34 Edward C. Holmes open
   Definitely an idiot.

Full conversation →