COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1105 [SLACK_001319] · slack_pm:msg:11528

Page text: p.1105 · original PDF

Date
2022-04-11 21:34
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Kristian G. Andersen

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Also, no Recommendations in the VF version at all - which is peculiar, because.... [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2022-04-11 at 21.33.54.png, Screen Shot 2022-04-11 at 21.34.07.png]

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2022-04-11 21:31 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Do we know which one is earlier? Because there are some very interesting differences...
  2. 2022-04-11 21:32 Edward C. Holmes open
    Yes! Forget about that one. Not sure which is earlier.
  3. 2022-04-11 21:32 Kristian G. Andersen open
    For example - here's VF: [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2022-04-11 at 21.31.56.png]
  4. 2022-04-11 21:33 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Here's what we have... Notice the arrow isn't in the VF version? (clearly, it's not the _same_ slide deck - just slightly different) [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2022-04-11 at 21.32.12.png]
  5. 2022-04-11 21:34 Kristian G. Andersen
    Also, no Recommendations in the VF version at all - which is peculiar, because.... [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2022-04-11 at 21.33.54.png, Screen Shot 2022-04-11 at 21.34.07.png]
  6. 2022-04-11 21:38 Kristian G. Andersen open
    The title of the VF file is "Peter Daszak WHO China joint study report for NSC 3-24-2021", so that's presumably the data of the presentation. Now, what was the date of what we have... Before or after? I'm thinking before... Also, notice the peculiar switch of "~Raccoon Dog~" "Mink" in the version we have becoming "~Mink~" "Raccoon Dog" in the VF article... (which we discussed previously). :man-shrugging: [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2022-04-11at 21.37.34.png, Screen Shot 2022-04-11 at 21.37.58.png]
  7. 2022-04-11 21:40 Edward C. Holmes open
    Wow! That is odd.
  8. 2022-04-11 21:41 Edward C. Holmes open
    I think it is 9 'racoon dog' in the WHO report with the same spelling mistake.
  9. 2022-04-11 21:42 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Actually, I think it's "Mink" in the WHO report - and I switched them around above, so it's Mink in Daszak's version and Raccoon Dog in VF's version

Full conversation →