Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1105 [SLACK_001319] · slack_pm:msg:11524

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Do we know which one is earlier? Because there are some very interesting differences...

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2022-04-11 21:26 Edward C. Holmes open

Cut him off.
2022-04-11 21:28 Kristian G. Andersen open

Will do.
2022-04-11 21:29 Kristian G. Andersen open

Also, I just noticed something quite interesting going back to this: https://andersenlab.slack.com/files/UT3183GLT/F023HDS9CQ3/peter_daszak_who___china_joint_study_report_fo r_eddie_holmes.pptx [shared file(s): Peter Daszak WHO & China joint study report for Eddie Holmes.pptx]
2022-04-11 21:30 Kristian G. Andersen open

That's the same slide deck (or similar) to the one from VF: https://downloads.vanityfair.com/ecohealth-alliance/peter-daszak-powerpoint.pdf
2022-04-11 21:31 Kristian G. Andersen

Do we know which one is earlier? Because there are some very interesting differences...
2022-04-11 21:32 Edward C. Holmes open

Yes! Forget about that one. Not sure which is earlier.
2022-04-11 21:32 Kristian G. Andersen open

For example - here's VF: [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2022-04-11 at 21.31.56.png]
2022-04-11 21:33 Kristian G. Andersen open

Here's what we have... Notice the arrow isn't in the VF version? (clearly, it's not the _same_ slide deck - just slightly different) [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2022-04-11 at 21.32.12.png]
2022-04-11 21:34 Kristian G. Andersen open

Also, no Recommendations in the VF version at all - which is peculiar, because.... [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2022-04-11 at 21.33.54.png, Screen Shot 2022-04-11 at 21.34.07.png]