A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it
answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.
-
Also, no Recommendations in the VF version at all - which is peculiar, because.... [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2022-04-11 at 21.33.54.png, Screen Shot 2022-04-11 at 21.34.07.png]
-
The title of the VF file is "Peter Daszak WHO China joint study report for NSC 3-24-2021", so that's presumably the data of the presentation. Now, what was the date of what we have... Before or after? I'm thinking before... Also, notice the peculiar switch of "~Raccoon Dog~" "Mink" in the version we have becoming "~Mink~" "Raccoon Dog" in the VF article... (which we discussed previously). :man-shrugging: [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2022-04-11at 21.37.34.png, Screen Shot 2022-04-11 at 21.37.58.png]
-
Wow! That is odd.
-
I think it is 9 'racoon dog' in the WHO report with the same spelling mistake.
-
2022-04-11 21:42
Kristian G. Andersen
Actually, I think it's "Mink" in the WHO report - and I switched them around above, so it's Mink in Daszak's version and Raccoon Dog in VF's version
-
https://twitter.com/TheTropaion/status/1510642039595151370?s=20&t=GKclqoRYreBX-1_YRchghg
-
Right...I agree that it is mink in the WHO and racoon dog in the VF, but there is also racoon dog in one table (Table10) in the WHO report. The same spelling error is interesting...
-
Yeah. Could just be simple spelling errors, but :man-shrugging:
-
Also, thank god for metadata - although, this'll get the Leakers go crazy... Look at the original title and create date. (obviously he just copied an old slide deck...) [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2022-04-11 at 21.48.10.png]