COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1029 [SLACK_001243] · slack_pm:msg:10759

Page text: p.1029 · original PDF

Date
2021-11-25 12:26
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Edward C. Holmes
Topics
Vaccines

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

That graph and it's header is a bit irresponsible. Can't make those conclusions with focused sampling on a poorlyimmunized population. That said, I hope that Moderna and Pfizer have redesigned their vaccines already

Extracted statements

Rule-extracted, not adjudicated. The grade says what may be done with each one; read the document above before relying on any of them.

StatementGradeAttributionStance
That said, I hope that Moderna and Pfizer have redesigned their vaccines already quoted / not their view paraphrase_third_party reporting frame: 'That said,' asserts

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2021-11-25 12:13 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Let's hope we're just looking at a sampling bias here - because if we're not, it doesn't matter what we do next. [shared file(s): FFEHAdRVUAQkWKg.png]
  2. 2021-11-25 12:16 Robert F. Garry open
    Working on ourrenewal @Kristian Andersen - Hoping this is not part of the justification...."Immunosuppressed individuals are thought to be the source variants, such as Ni that accelerated the COVID-19 pandemic and drove itto new heights."
  3. 2021-11-25 12:18 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Let's hope not Bob. I think Nu could likely be a big problem, but surely the early data can't be correct.
  4. 2021-11-25 12:23 Robert F. Garry open
    Nu - sorry - @Andrew Rambaut put Monty Python into my head and it's going to be hard to get away from that image of the knights...
  5. 2021-11-25 12:26 Edward C. Holmes
    That graph and it's header is a bit irresponsible. Can't make those conclusions with focused sampling on a poorlyimmunized population. That said, I hope that Moderna and Pfizer have redesigned their vaccines already
  6. 2021-11-25 12:28 Edward C. Holmes open
    Both Andrew and I know Sean Nee well. He was not a fan of Monty Python.
  7. 2021-11-25 12:29 Andrew Rambaut open
    It was estimated today that it would take 6-9 months to get an updated mRNA vaccine to deployable stocks.
  8. 2021-11-25 12:33 Edward C. Holmes open
    Pfizer were bragging they could get it ready in 100 days...I guess that's not deployable stocks though.
  9. 2021-11-25 12:39 Kristian G. Andersen open
    @Eddie Holmes - the graph is based on SGTF, not sequencing, so not nearly as biased. That said, it's still biased and it simply can't be correct.

Full conversation →