A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it
answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.
-
I think JB main point is they removed some SRA data re early cases - the data IMO - and maybe I can be shown the error of my ways - adds basically zero. It allows JB to complain about lack of transparency I guess.
-
We already discussed this - the 'intermediates' are dubious and from February
-
It's a weird sort of stream of consciousness paper. Very naughty to include an email from the unrelated pangolin study in there. Is that even legal?
-
The WA1 tree - fig 4 and 6 looks fine to me - but me and trees so i really dunno. However the midle guangdong tree looks like :hankey: and forced just based on where WA1 lands, but again i'm no good here at all.
-
2021-06-19 14:58
Edward C. Holmes
The February part seems important....
-
Unrelated pangolin study - must be either from Alina or a present to Alina. Seriously - not legal - invasion of privacy -unless he got permission somehow from all parties.
-
Yes, I agree. Can't believe he is doing this.
-
Where did this paper come from? Is it public?
-
WA1 "The patient is a man in his 30s who lives alone. He had been traveling solo since November in Wuhan, China,a city of 11 million where the outbreak appears to have originated, health officials said. He had no symptoms on hisflight or when he arrived at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport on Jan. 15, but he contacted doctors Jan. 19 whenhe developed a fever and cough, officials said. It's unknown which clinic he visited that day. The man was hospitalized for pneumonia and, on Monday, tested positive for coronavirus."