COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.947 [SLACK_001161] · slack_pm:msg:09859

Page text: p.947 · original PDF

Date
2021-06-19 14:56
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Kristian G. Andersen, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Robert F. Garry

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

The WA1 tree - fig 4 and 6 looks fine to me - but me and trees so i really dunno. However the midle guangdong tree looks like :hankey: and forced just based on where WA1 lands, but again i'm no good here at all.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2021-06-19 14:45 Edward C. Holmes open
    Is this something or nothing? I can't quite get my head around it.
  2. 2021-06-19 14:49 Robert F. Garry open
    I think JB main point is they removed some SRA data re early cases - the data IMO - and maybe I can be shown the error of my ways - adds basically zero. It allows JB to complain about lack of transparency I guess.
  3. 2021-06-19 14:49 Andrew Rambaut open
    We already discussed this - the 'intermediates' are dubious and from February
  4. 2021-06-19 14:52 Edward C. Holmes open
    It's a weird sort of stream of consciousness paper. Very naughty to include an email from the unrelated pangolin study in there. Is that even legal?
  5. 2021-06-19 14:56 Robert F. Garry
    The WA1 tree - fig 4 and 6 looks fine to me - but me and trees so i really dunno. However the midle guangdong tree looks like :hankey: and forced just based on where WA1 lands, but again i'm no good here at all.
  6. 2021-06-19 14:58 Edward C. Holmes open
    The February part seems important....
  7. 2021-06-19 15:02 Robert F. Garry open
    Unrelated pangolin study - must be either from Alina or a present to Alina. Seriously - not legal - invasion of privacy -unless he got permission somehow from all parties.
  8. 2021-06-19 15:03 Edward C. Holmes open
    Yes, I agree. Can't believe he is doing this.
  9. 2021-06-19 15:31 Andrew Rambaut open
    Where did this paper come from? Is it public?

Full conversation →