Chat message

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

1. 2021-06-19 13:30 Robert F. Garry open
   @Kristian Andersen let me know if you want to have call later today/tomorrow before Tony/FrancisII - interested inyour thoughts
2. 2021-06-19 14:08 Kristian G. Andersen
   Yeah cutting my trip short for this and will be back tonight. Can we set up a call Sunday am with Andrew too?
3. 2021-06-19 14:09 Kristian G. Andersen open
   I haven't looked at any of this yet
4. 2021-06-19 14:44 Robert F. Garry open
   "The second explanation, which was proposed in a blog post by Garry (2021) and amplified by a popular podcast (Racaniello _et al._ 2021), is that there were multiple zoonoses from distinct markets, with the Huanan Seafood Market being the source of viruses in clade B, and some other market being the source of viruses that lack the T8782C and C28144T mutations. However, inspection of Fig- ure 4 shows that clade B is connected to viruses lacking T8782C and C28144T by single mutational steps via other human iso- lates, so this explanation requires not only positing two markets with two progenitors differing by just two mutations, but also the exceedingly improbableevolution of one of these progenitors towards the other after it had jumped to humans." Actually no - simple to see how the mutations might have become fixed in the progression -I think the take-home is JB is dead set that Rambautis wrong and actually B came before A. Because? [shared file(s): image.png]
5. 2021-06-19 14:45 Edward C. Holmes open
   Is this something or nothing? I can't quite get my head around it.
6. 2021-06-19 14:49 Robert F. Garry open
   I think JB main point is they removed some SRA data re early cases - the data IMO - and maybe I can be shown the error of my ways - adds basically zero. It allows JB to complain about lack of transparency I guess.

Full conversation →