Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.920 [SLACK_001134] · slack_pm:msg:09545

Date: 2021-06-04 15:21
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Robert F. Garry

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

You got the majors - here are a few others parked here for context. Angie may have some more it seems. [shared file(s): image.png, image.png, image.png, image.png, image.png]

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-06-04 14:36 Edward C. Holmes open

shared file(s): Another image.png
2021-06-04 14:37 Edward C. Holmes open

I am an author of these papers and she directly mentions 'severe research integrity'.
2021-06-04 14:37 Edward C. Holmes open

However, Bob, if you have other good examples they would be great to have for the future.
2021-06-04 15:06 Robert F. Garry open

I'll look -those are the most important...
2021-06-04 15:21 Robert F. Garry

You got the majors - here are a few others parked here for context. Angie may have some more it seems. [shared file(s): image.png, image.png, image.png, image.png, image.png]
2021-06-04 15:21 Edward C. Holmes open

She also asked Nick Loman on Twitter if I was an original author on the Nature paper. She's bloody evil.
2021-06-04 15:24 Edward C. Holmes open

Thanks Bob! She's spectacularly stupid. Look at the Boston Magazine: [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-06-05 at 7.46.09 am.png]
2021-06-04 15:27 Edward C. Holmes open

She claims that the pangolin virus may have been contracted from their smugglers. So, in 2019 before the pandemic started smugglers in southern China in were infected by a virus that is related to, but not the same as, SARS-CoV-2, and then infected pangolins.
2021-06-04 15:30 Edward C. Holmes open

Totally WRONG to say that the Lam et al. paper just uses the first paper's (Liu et al....published before the pandemic) data.

Full conversation →