COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.757 [SLACK_000971] · slack_pm:msg:07929

Page text: p.757 · original PDF

Date
2021-05-06 20:41
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Kristian G. Andersen

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Yup. I expect RelBloom will do the same.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2021-05-06 20:30 Kristian G. Andersen open
    No engineering in this one, but also about cleavage. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31801868/
  2. 2021-05-06 20:32 Edward C. Holmes open
    I'm surprised this virus didn't emerge in Raleigh.
  3. 2021-05-06 20:35 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Yeah, me too.
  4. 2021-05-06 20:40 Edward C. Holmes open
    Quickly on Wade: pretty amazing that he accuses us of bad science when he ignores ALL the counter data.
  5. 2021-05-06 20:41 Kristian G. Andersen
    Yup. I expect RelBloom will do the same.
  6. 2021-05-06 20:42 Kristian G. Andersen open
    When it comes to Baric fiddling with viruses, this, of course, is the mother of all papers... https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0924-2
  7. 2021-05-06 20:42 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Well, this https://www.nature.com/articles/nm.3985
  8. 2021-05-06 20:52 Edward C. Holmes open
    And it shows the key point: you use a standard backbone when you do this GOF work. And surely Shi would have done the same as she collaborated with Baric? And surely she would have asked Baric for advice but there's nothing in his emails?
  9. 2021-05-06 20:55 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Yup. Exactly.

Full conversation →