COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.757 [SLACK_000971] · slack_pm:msg:07928

Page text: p.757 · original PDF

Date
2021-05-06 20:40
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Edward C. Holmes

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Quickly on Wade: pretty amazing that he accuses us of bad science when he ignores ALL the counter data.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2021-05-06 20:28 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Probably the closest example: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26063432/
  2. 2021-05-06 20:30 Kristian G. Andersen open
    No engineering in this one, but also about cleavage. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31801868/
  3. 2021-05-06 20:32 Edward C. Holmes open
    I'm surprised this virus didn't emerge in Raleigh.
  4. 2021-05-06 20:35 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Yeah, me too.
  5. 2021-05-06 20:40 Edward C. Holmes
    Quickly on Wade: pretty amazing that he accuses us of bad science when he ignores ALL the counter data.
  6. 2021-05-06 20:41 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Yup. I expect RelBloom will do the same.
  7. 2021-05-06 20:42 Kristian G. Andersen open
    When it comes to Baric fiddling with viruses, this, of course, is the mother of all papers... https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0924-2
  8. 2021-05-06 20:42 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Well, this https://www.nature.com/articles/nm.3985
  9. 2021-05-06 20:52 Edward C. Holmes open
    And it shows the key point: you use a standard backbone when you do this GOF work. And surely Shi would have done the same as she collaborated with Baric? And surely she would have asked Baric for advice but there's nothing in his emails?

Full conversation →