COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.731 [SLACK_000945] · slack_pm:msg:07666

Page text: p.731 · original PDF

Date
2021-04-27 19:18
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Edward C. Holmes
Topics
Masks, lockdowns and NPIs

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

I had at chat with the genomics people here yesterday and they said that most of the people who are coming into our hotel quarantine system from India have B.1.1.7. Apparently 20% on one flight were infected.

Extracted statements

Rule-extracted, not adjudicated. The grade says what may be done with each one; read the document above before relying on any of them.

StatementGradeAttributionStance
I had at chat with the genomics people here yesterday and they said that most of the people who are coming into our hotel quarantine system from India have B.1.1.7. quoted / not their view paraphrase_third_party third-party reporting verb asserts

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2021-04-27 18:44 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Are we starting to think maybe P681H/R could be a bad boy? Looking at the most recent variants, assuming B.1.617might plausibly be both more transmissible and escape some level of immunity, the latter comes down to L452R and the NTD, while the former may be linked to P681R (it doesn't have N501Y).P681H/R absent from both P.1 and B.1.351 (I'm getting increasingly more convinced 351 isn't more transmissible, but I'm less sure about P.1). [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-04-27 at 6.42.05 PM.png]
  2. 2021-04-27 18:45 Kristian G. Andersen open
    If looking outside the spike, what do we know about N? An interest pattern around position 203/204/205 here [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-04-27 at 6.39.40 PM.png]
  3. 2021-04-27 18:46 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Could N be involved in transmissibility? Live link here: https://outbreak.info/compare-lineages?pango=B.1.1.7&pango=B.1.351&pango=P.1& pango=[...]gene=ORF7a&gene=ORF7b&gene=ORF8&gene=N&gene=ORF10&threshold=
  4. 2021-04-27 18:47 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Interferon?
  5. 2021-04-27 19:18 Edward C. Holmes
    I had at chat with the genomics people here yesterday and they said that most of the people who are coming into our hotel quarantine system from India have B.1.1.7. Apparently 20% on one flight were infected.
  6. 2021-04-27 19:19 Robert F. Garry open
    "Could N be involved in transmissibility?" yes - I'll take a look.
  7. 2021-04-27 19:40 Kristian G. Andersen open
    20%... I think we see an example of what can happen if you give B.1.1.7 (and possibly 617) free reign. Pure devastation - the reports are terrifying.
  8. 2021-04-27 20:30 Kristian G. Andersen open
    So much bs in this one. Phase I and II trials for vaccines against novel viruses we don't know anything about? Other than, of course, they're the most likely ones to case future pandemics. Suuuuuure._"Step two is something like Operation Warp Speed for the pandemics of the future. Once scientists have the resources to identify and track viruses with the gravest pandemic potential, a consortium of countries led by the U.S.should fund Phase 1 and Phase 2 trials around the world to test new vaccines against them."_https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/04/how-pandemic-proof-world/618682/

Full conversation →