Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.666 [SLACK_000880] · slack_pm:msg:06982

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Is there a plan to "publish" a summary report? Is the WHO team going to do a joint publication? Seems like perhapsPO2 might now be in order.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-03-31 13:02 Edward C. Holmes open

One think we predict though was that having Daszak on has back-fired badly. What were they thinking?
2021-03-31 13:18 Edward C. Holmes open

All we can do is ignore all this noise and just try to focus on the science.
2021-03-31 13:19 Kristian G. Andersen open

The noise is like a roaring highway though - and driven by some very high profile scientists. It's sad, really.
2021-03-31 13:21 Edward C. Holmes open

True, but there's no way that China will let another team in so ultimately it's all pointless
2021-03-31 13:35 Robert F. Garry

Is there a plan to "publish" a summary report? Is the WHO team going to do a joint publication? Seems like perhapsPO2 might now be in order.
2021-03-31 14:18 Edward C. Holmes open

Can't believe WHO will publish. There's also Daszak's Lancet Commission. PO2 is an idea...to focus tightly on the science. Can we plan this after Easter? I'll see where we are with the pangolins.
2021-03-31 14:22 Robert F. Garry open

IIRC The Lancet thing is targeted for end of the year . Yes - after Easter GOOD! Lots of science has come since PO1.
2021-03-31 14:26 Robert F. Garry open

BTW !channel one of these posters is coming to each of you [even Ian] - just need to find some appropriately largepackaging. [shared file(s): IMG_1694.JPG]
2021-03-31 14:38 Edward C. Holmes open

Thanks @Robert Garry that's amazing!!