Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.666 [SLACK_000880] · slack_pm:msg:06979

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

All we can do is ignore all this noise and just try to focus on the science.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-03-31 12:59 Robert F. Garry open

Agreed - Another one who didn't read/understand the report.
2021-03-31 13:00 Edward C. Holmes open

The evidence is pretty well laid out in Annex D
2021-03-31 13:01 Robert F. Garry open

If you go to the end PBS actually does some real reporting - they quote 3 current White House staff to the effect that the Pompeo DoS "fact sheet" was cherry-picked out of a cacophony of noise.
2021-03-31 13:02 Edward C. Holmes open

One think we predict though was that having Daszak on has back-fired badly. What were they thinking?
2021-03-31 13:18 Edward C. Holmes

All we can do is ignore all this noise and just try to focus on the science.
2021-03-31 13:19 Kristian G. Andersen open

The noise is like a roaring highway though - and driven by some very high profile scientists. It's sad, really.
2021-03-31 13:21 Edward C. Holmes open

True, but there's no way that China will let another team in so ultimately it's all pointless
2021-03-31 13:35 Robert F. Garry open

Is there a plan to "publish" a summary report? Is the WHO team going to do a joint publication? Seems like perhapsPO2 might now be in order.
2021-03-31 14:18 Edward C. Holmes open

Can't believe WHO will publish. There's also Daszak's Lancet Commission. PO2 is an idea...to focus tightly on the science. Can we plan this after Easter? I'll see where we are with the pangolins.