Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.666 [SLACK_000880] · slack_pm:msg:06985

Date: 2021-03-31 14:26
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Robert F. Garry

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

BTW !channel one of these posters is coming to each of you [even Ian] - just need to find some appropriately largepackaging. [shared file(s): IMG_1694.JPG]

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-03-31 13:21 Edward C. Holmes open

True, but there's no way that China will let another team in so ultimately it's all pointless
2021-03-31 13:35 Robert F. Garry open

Is there a plan to "publish" a summary report? Is the WHO team going to do a joint publication? Seems like perhapsPO2 might now be in order.
2021-03-31 14:18 Edward C. Holmes open

Can't believe WHO will publish. There's also Daszak's Lancet Commission. PO2 is an idea...to focus tightly on the science. Can we plan this after Easter? I'll see where we are with the pangolins.
2021-03-31 14:22 Robert F. Garry open

IIRC The Lancet thing is targeted for end of the year . Yes - after Easter GOOD! Lots of science has come since PO1.
2021-03-31 14:26 Robert F. Garry

BTW !channel one of these posters is coming to each of you [even Ian] - just need to find some appropriately largepackaging. [shared file(s): IMG_1694.JPG]
2021-03-31 14:38 Edward C. Holmes open

Thanks @Robert Garry that's amazing!!
2021-03-31 15:25 Kristian G. Andersen open

Haha, love the poster :zany_face:
2021-03-31 15:58 Edward C. Holmes open

Thank god for the South China Morning Post: https://www.scmp.com/comment/opinion/article/3127858/let-science-decide-origins-covid-19
2021-03-31 16:18 Kristian G. Andersen open

Good for them - WSJ should read this... "The theory needs to be laid to rest lest it distracts from scientific tracking ofthe virus" :clap:

Full conversation →