Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.659 [SLACK_000873] · slack_pm:msg:06900

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

That was going to the care under any circumstances But there's nothing in this doc that makes a lab leak more likely

Extracted statements

Rule-extracted, not adjudicated. The grade says what may be done with each one; read the document above before relying on any of them.

Statement	Grade	Attribution	Stance
That was going to the care under any circumstances But there's nothing in this doc that makes a lab leak more likely	needs context	uncertain explicit hedge	asserts

Statement

Grade

Attribution

Stance

That was going to the care under any circumstances But there's nothing in this doc that makes a lab leak more likely

needs context

uncertain explicit hedge

asserts

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-03-29 21:00 Kristian G. Andersen open

I'll keep digging...
2021-03-29 21:01 Edward C. Holmes open

You won't be alone
2021-03-29 21:01 Kristian G. Andersen open

That's the problem - what I'm finding here, Steve Quay will also find.
2021-03-29 21:03 Kristian G. Andersen open

Because the one insight he did have, was this. So he'll be doing what I'm doing right now. [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-03-29 at 9.02.29 PM.png]
2021-03-29 21:03 Edward C. Holmes

That was going to the care under any circumstances But there's nothing in this doc that makes a lab leak more likely
2021-03-29 21:03 Kristian G. Andersen open

Good. I'll keep reading.. :wink:
2021-03-29 21:06 Edward C. Holmes open

So, people took a metro to 4 of the biggest hospitals in Wuhan, including the central one. And?
2021-03-29 21:12 Edward C. Holmes open

Tomorrow is going to be mad
2021-03-29 21:20 Kristian G. Andersen open

I need some ammo from the report - so let's make sure we all post some of that!