Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.659 [SLACK_000873] · slack_pm:msg:06904

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

I need some ammo from the report - so let's make sure we all post some of that!

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-03-29 21:03 Edward C. Holmes open

That was going to the care under any circumstances But there's nothing in this doc that makes a lab leak more likely
2021-03-29 21:03 Kristian G. Andersen open

Good. I'll keep reading.. :wink:
2021-03-29 21:06 Edward C. Holmes open

So, people took a metro to 4 of the biggest hospitals in Wuhan, including the central one. And?
2021-03-29 21:12 Edward C. Holmes open

Tomorrow is going to be mad
2021-03-29 21:20 Kristian G. Andersen

I need some ammo from the report - so let's make sure we all post some of that!
2021-03-29 21:21 Kristian G. Andersen open

I.e., not what I'm doing right now :wink:
2021-03-29 21:24 Edward C. Holmes open

I'm only taking questions about raccoon dogs
2021-03-29 21:57 Kristian G. Andersen open

Thank fuck for this! Here are the dates - starts in the North and then spread South. In other words from the Market and across the city. Good old triangulation - with, of course, a heavy bias due to the market investigation, but still. [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-03-29 at 9.56.07 PM.png]
2021-03-29 21:58 Kristian G. Andersen open

I like this report - doesn't exactly smell like a cover up. Way, way, way too many people involved at multiple different levels - and it isn't exactly a clean report, which lends credence to it being scientific, because science is messy.