A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it
answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.
-
What do you make of that ACE2 stuff? If all their staff are negative then it's game over....unless there's been massive cover-up.
-
"her laboratory used recombinant viruses to test whether bat CoVs could use ACE2 to bind but used bat spike protein on *a bat-CoV backbone*, not human SARS" Which backbone?
-
"*other researchers* engineered SHC014 spike so did not need isolates for mouse experiments. WIV began recombinant work in 2015 with WIV-1. It received ACE2 mice in 2016 and *started recombinant experiments with WIV +SHC014* in 2018 but did not finish them owing to the COVID outbreak" This might all just be bad writing, but there's a lot of wiggle room in these statements. I'm not really sure how tointerpret them.
-
Yes, I couldn't quite follow it either. I guess she means SCH014 which is a SARS-like virus. This accords with her comments to John Cohen that they were only working on SARS-like viruses.
-
2021-03-29 16:32
Edward C. Holmes
Dominic also said that it clear that the intelligence services have nothing.
-
Yeah, maybe they're just referring to this? https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4797993/
-
A lot of the conspiracy theories mention the "GOF Research" at WIV and how they made these scary recombinant viruses - but that work was in DeepThroat's lab, not at WIV - so maybe that's what they're pushing against.
-
Yes, that's the one.
-
Yeah, I think that's what they're saying - "we did stuff in bats, but the human conspiracy stuff isn't actually us".