Chat message
Slack / Private Message Drop, p.641 [SLACK_000855] · slack_pm:msg:06721
Page text: p.641 · original PDF
- Date
- 2021-03-26 15:59
- Type
- chat message · slack
- recipient
- Kristian G. Andersen, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
- speaker
- Robert F. Garry
Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.
https://www.newsweek.com/humans-not-animals-likely-took-covid-virus-wuhan-contrary-chinas-claims-1578861
"The science is also bad because it isn't based on any on-the-ground evidence. There were many cases of
COVID-19 in Wuhan before the market outbreak. In addition, the only live animals in the market seem to have been*snakes, turtles, and frogs*, none of whom are potential carriers, and they all tested negative. Peter Daszak himself has admitted that all of the carcasses examined tested negative for SARS-CoV-2. Yes, you read that right: the theory is based on the fact that they didn't find any infected animals in Wuhan.In any case, the director of China's Center for Disease Control dismissed the market theory last May, explaining that there was no connection and that the virus "existed long before" it was found in the market, which makes it *rather extraordinary that the WHO team chose to spend its limited time poking around the empty building (which had been closed, cleared and disinfected more than a year ago*)."
Links shared
- news https://www.newsweek.com/humans-not-animals-likely-took-covid-virus-wuhan-contrary-chinas-claims-1578861