COVID-19 Records

Slack / Private Message Drop — page 641

of 1123 pages · Bates SLACK_000855

← p.640 p.642 → · this page in the original PDF · package

190; 15,279; (23,012); 23,683 Ancestral, shared 8,782; (28,144) [shared file(s): tanzania_variant_snps.xlsx, tanzania_variant.geneious] [2021-03-26 15:27:46] [Eddie Holmes] I think these are raccoon dogs...stacked in cages. [shared file(s): 20141029_152015.jpg] [2021-03-26 15:39:01] [Kristian Andersen] Yours? [2021-03-26 15:42:03] [Robert Garry] Sure looks like this animal to me! [shared file(s): image.png] [2021-03-26 15:45:41] [Eddie Holmes] Yes, my photo from the market. [2021-03-26 15:46:15] [Eddie Holmes] So, not just one animal in a cage on the floor. [2021-03-26 15:49:12] [Robert Garry] Here's the photo from your CNN report - unverified footage they say but sure looks like the same animal species. [shared file(s): image.png] [2021-03-26 15:51:21] [Eddie Holmes] So, they've been selling these animals there for years. An accident waiting to happen. [2021-03-26 15:59:22] [Robert Garry] https://www.newsweek.com/humans-not-animals-likely-took-covid-virus-wuhan-contrary-chinas-claims-1578861 "The science is also bad because it isn't based on any on-the-ground evidence. There were many cases of COVID-19 in Wuhan before the market outbreak. In addition, the only live animals in the market seem to have been *snakes, turtles, and frogs*, none of whom are potential carriers, and they all tested negative. Peter Daszak himself has admitted that all of the carcasses examined tested negative for SARS-CoV-2. Yes, you read that right: the theory is based on the fact that they didn't find any infected animals in Wuhan. In any case, the director of China's Center for Disease Control dismissed the market theory last May, explaining that there was no connection and that the virus "existed long before" it was found in the market, which makes it *rather extraordinary that the WHO team chose to spend its limited time poking around the empty building (which had been closed, cleared and disinfected more than a year ago*)." [2021-03-26 16:01:29] [Robert Garry] SAme Rowan Jacobson who wrote the Alina Chan crap for Boston Magazine, Could COVID-19 Have Escaped from a Lab? The world's preeminent scientists say a theory from the Broad Institute's Alina Chan is too wild to be believed. But when the theory is about the possibility of COVID being man-made, is this science or censorship? [2021-03-26 16:03:34] [Robert Garry]

This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The Committee's PDF is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned text: /api/page/slack_pm/641

Records on this page

RecordDateTypePages
slack_pm:msg:06713 2021-03-26 chat message 640–641
slack_pm:msg:06714 2021-03-26 chat message 641
slack_pm:msg:06715 2021-03-26 chat message 641
slack_pm:msg:06716 2021-03-26 chat message 641
slack_pm:msg:06717 2021-03-26 chat message 641
slack_pm:msg:06718 2021-03-26 chat message 641
slack_pm:msg:06719 2021-03-26 chat message 641
slack_pm:msg:06720 2021-03-26 chat message 641
slack_pm:msg:06721 2021-03-26 chat message 641
slack_pm:msg:06722 2021-03-26 chat message 641
slack_pm:msg:06723 2021-03-26 chat message 641–642