Slack / Private Message Drop — page 641
of 1123 pages · Bates SLACK_000855
← p.640 p.642 → · this page in the original PDF · package
190; 15,279; (23,012); 23,683
Ancestral, shared
8,782; (28,144) [shared file(s): tanzania_variant_snps.xlsx, tanzania_variant.geneious]
[2021-03-26 15:27:46]
[Eddie Holmes]
I think these are raccoon dogs...stacked in cages. [shared file(s): 20141029_152015.jpg]
[2021-03-26 15:39:01]
[Kristian Andersen]
Yours?
[2021-03-26 15:42:03]
[Robert Garry]
Sure looks like this animal to me! [shared file(s): image.png]
[2021-03-26 15:45:41]
[Eddie Holmes]
Yes, my photo from the market.
[2021-03-26 15:46:15]
[Eddie Holmes]
So, not just one animal in a cage on the floor.
[2021-03-26 15:49:12]
[Robert Garry]
Here's the photo from your CNN report - unverified footage they say but sure looks like the same animal species.
[shared file(s): image.png]
[2021-03-26 15:51:21]
[Eddie Holmes]
So, they've been selling these animals there for years. An accident waiting to happen.
[2021-03-26 15:59:22]
[Robert Garry]
https://www.newsweek.com/humans-not-animals-likely-took-covid-virus-wuhan-contrary-chinas-claims-1578861
"The science is also bad because it isn't based on any on-the-ground evidence. There were many cases of
COVID-19 in Wuhan before the market outbreak. In addition, the only live animals in the market seem to have been
*snakes, turtles, and frogs*, none of whom are potential carriers, and they all tested negative. Peter Daszak himself
has admitted that all of the carcasses examined tested negative for SARS-CoV-2. Yes, you read that right: the
theory is based on the fact that they didn't find any infected animals in Wuhan.
In any case, the director of China's Center for Disease Control dismissed the market theory last May, explaining that
there was no connection and that the virus "existed long before" it was found in the market, which makes it *rather
extraordinary that the WHO team chose to spend its limited time poking around the empty building (which had been
closed, cleared and disinfected more than a year ago*)."
[2021-03-26 16:01:29]
[Robert Garry]
SAme Rowan Jacobson who wrote the Alina Chan crap for Boston Magazine, Could COVID-19 Have Escaped from
a Lab?
The world's preeminent scientists say a theory from the Broad Institute's Alina Chan is too wild to be believed. But
when the theory is about the possibility of COVID being man-made, is this science or censorship?
[2021-03-26 16:03:34]
[Robert Garry]
This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The
Committee's PDF
is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned
text: /api/page/slack_pm/641
Records on this page
| Record | Date | Type | Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| slack_pm:msg:06713 | 2021-03-26 | chat message | 640–641 |
| slack_pm:msg:06714 | 2021-03-26 | chat message | 641 |
| slack_pm:msg:06715 | 2021-03-26 | chat message | 641 |
| slack_pm:msg:06716 | 2021-03-26 | chat message | 641 |
| slack_pm:msg:06717 | 2021-03-26 | chat message | 641 |
| slack_pm:msg:06718 | 2021-03-26 | chat message | 641 |
| slack_pm:msg:06719 | 2021-03-26 | chat message | 641 |
| slack_pm:msg:06720 | 2021-03-26 | chat message | 641 |
| slack_pm:msg:06721 | 2021-03-26 | chat message | 641 |
| slack_pm:msg:06722 | 2021-03-26 | chat message | 641 |
| slack_pm:msg:06723 | 2021-03-26 | chat message | 641–642 |