Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.628 [SLACK_000842] · slack_pm:msg:06575

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

https://www.independentsciencenews.org/commentaries/an-interview-with-richard-ebright-anthony-fauci-francis-collins-systematically-thwarted/

Links shared

other https://www.independentsciencenews.org/commentaries/an-interview-with-richard-ebright-anthony-fauci-francis-collins-systematically-thwarted/

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-03-24 11:58 Robert F. Garry

https://www.independentsciencenews.org/commentaries/an-interview-with-richard-ebright-anthony-fauci-francis-collins-systematically-thwarted/
2021-03-24 11:58 Robert F. Garry open

E-dim
2021-03-24 12:31 Edward C. Holmes open

Surely that's defamation?
2021-03-24 12:52 Kristian G. Andersen open

E-dim. Love it :wink:. As for the surface samples. I enquired, and _my own lab_ has actually managed to get full genomes from surface samples... Ct values typically quite strong in the mid-twenties.
2021-03-24 12:52 Robert F. Garry open

That was my exact thought. PD is arguably a public figure, which raises the bar quite a bit, but I'm with you. If you'rea public figure you have to prove actual malice. I'd testify that YES this is actual malice.