Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.587 [SLACK_000801] · slack_pm:msg:06139

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Will check it out!

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-03-11 11:14 Robert F. Garry open

Also working on an update to Holmes2021 virological post - including the new Weifeng viruses from the garden. [shared file(s): image.png]
2021-03-11 11:19 Robert F. Garry open

O-glycans included here in the N terminus, but also some "new" ones near the S1/S2 junction. Hard to think that thisis all just coincidence.
2021-03-11 11:20 Robert F. Garry open

Also updating Figure 2, but not quite there yet.
2021-03-11 11:20 Edward C. Holmes open

Thanks Bob! There's another close bat CoV on GISAID - PrC31 I think. Also from Yunnan. This is from the China CDC. Paper being written up apparently.
2021-03-11 11:22 Robert F. Garry

Will check it out!
2021-03-11 11:37 Robert F. Garry open

It's VERY close to RpYN06 in spike. [shared file(s): image.png]
2021-03-11 11:45 Robert F. Garry open

Very close [shared file(s): image.png]
2021-03-11 11:46 Kristian G. Andersen open

@Andrew Rambaut - reading the most recent PHE report on VOCs/VOIs (so good!), is it fair to say that non-B.1.1.7 VOCs just aren't that successful in the UK compared to B.1.1.7? Enough data to make that conclusion? Separately, is it fair to say that B.1.1.7 lineages with mutations such as E484K don't appear to be any more successful than 'vanilla' B.1.1.7?
2021-03-11 11:47 Edward C. Holmes open

Interesting!