Chat message

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

1. 2021-03-09 19:19 Robert F. Garry open
   Maybe that explains Lander not doing anything with Alina. Sad.
2. 2021-03-09 19:23 Robert F. Garry open
   But, I think they'll be other opportunities to set the record straight - plus the fact that there are closer viruses out there in nature. Just a question of whether Alina et al. can shut down the work before they are found.
3. 2021-03-09 19:24 Kristian G. Andersen open
   Oh, Josh Rogin.... It's amazing you can actually write a full article but without saying anything at all - pure wordsoup.
4. 2021-03-09 19:35 Edward C. Holmes open
   So, the White House no nothing which means there is no security agency information on the lab escape. End of story.
5. 2021-03-09 19:35 Kristian G. Andersen
   Yup - simple as that.
6. 2021-03-09 19:36 Kristian G. Andersen open
   One year in and not a single lead suggestion any connection to the lab - which is actually quite remarkable in the sense that they could cook _anything_ up to make it at least _appear_ to be related to lab escape. But they don't even have that.
7. 2021-03-09 19:37 Kristian G. Andersen open
   Also, definitely not a conspiracy theorist. Not at all. [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-03-09 at 7.31.45 PM.png, Screen Shot 2021-03-09 at 7.33.06 PM.png, Screen Shot 2021-03-09 at 7.33.50 PM.png, Screen Shot 2021-03-09at 7.34.21 PM.png, Screen Shot 2021-03-09 at 7.35.06 PM.png]
8. 2021-03-09 19:41 Robert F. Garry open
   "Nature just had a podcast with bad information." Really?
9. 2021-03-09 19:46 Edward C. Holmes open
   Absolutely crazy. Can't wait for that WHO report!

Full conversation →