Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.555 [SLACK_000769] · slack_pm:msg:05785

Date: 2021-02-28 12:54
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes
speaker: Andrew Rambaut

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Basically she found a 'californian' virus with 69/70 deletion in it and was claiming it was recombinant with a B.1.1.7.But 69/70 comes up all the time.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-02-28 12:52 Kristian G. Andersen open

@Eddie Holmes Did she listen? She never listens....
2021-02-28 12:52 Edward C. Holmes open

Did she believe you?
2021-02-28 12:52 Andrew Rambaut open

Of course not.
2021-02-28 12:53 Andrew Rambaut open

Her group has some hokey triplet method which is totally useless as you don't have an outgroup
2021-02-28 12:54 Andrew Rambaut

Basically she found a 'californian' virus with 69/70 deletion in it and was claiming it was recombinant with a B.1.1.7.But 69/70 comes up all the time.
2021-02-28 12:54 Andrew Rambaut open

I spent way too long on it.
2021-02-28 12:55 Kristian G. Andersen open

Wait, she specifically said 69/70 came from B.1.1.7 and hence it must be a recombinant? That's, well, dumb. Very.
2021-02-28 12:56 Edward C. Holmes open

What an idiot. I look forward to reviewing that for Cell.
2021-02-28 12:58 Andrew Rambaut open

That was the only homoplasy but she had a convincing looking plot of the two 'parents' and the 'recombinant' and itshowed a tract in spike that looked like B.1.1.7 compared to the other parent. But it was actually also the same asthe reference and the other parent had had some mutations. Just so dumb

Full conversation →