Chat message

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

1. 2021-02-23 13:58 Edward C. Holmes open
   They would not be the people who would release the key info.
2. 2021-02-23 13:58 Robert F. Garry open
   Isn't OoP Eric Lander?
3. 2021-02-23 13:59 Kristian G. Andersen open
   Not a scam - legit email sender. Yeah, Lander is the scientific advisor.
4. 2021-02-23 14:02 Edward C. Holmes open
   Tell him that Alina is a pain in the arse. I'm not all impressed with the behaviour of the Broad on this and a variety ofother matters.
5. 2021-02-23 14:03 Robert F. Garry
   She is evil and not helping the reputation of the Broad.
6. 2021-02-23 14:19 Robert F. Garry open
   The only lab release "theory" that is possible is if WIV or another lab actually had SC2 or a virus that is one or two steps away from SC2. If anyone had one of these 1. no reason to hide it before the outbreak.and 2. hiding SC2 orthe preSC2 would require the greatest conspiracy EVER. The corollary to this is that in this case SC2 or preSC2 is aNATURAL virus. The Baker/Alina/Relman crap about stopping work on bat/animal CoVs cause someone could have brought it back to the lab also needs vetted somewhere other than the WSJ.
7. 2021-02-23 14:44 Robert F. Garry open
   The crap about stopping work on bat/animal CoVs is Alina's revenge for all the natural origins proponents that have called out her bullshit. Give the devil her due it's gotten some level of traction, esp with the whole GoF crowdweighing in.
8. 2021-02-23 15:08 Edward C. Holmes open
   Totally agree Bob. Someone said that our latest post was just covered in This Week in Virology. I'm not sure if I have the strength to listen.

Full conversation →