Chat message

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

1. 2021-02-03 12:24 Edward C. Holmes open
   There's no point debating Fox with science.
2. 2021-02-03 12:29 Robert F. Garry open
   Unfortunately - and give Alina, Relman and a slew of others of the ilk "credit" where it's due- the left is alsoembracing the crazy. I've *completely reworked* the commentary re the new Bat CoVs and will update the google doc later today. THe version up there is way out of date.
3. 2021-02-03 12:35 Edward C. Holmes open
   Fair point. I doubt if the 3 hours the WHO spent at WIV yesterday is going to appease many people. Looks like they are on a well planned sightseeing tour of Wuhan. I'll have a look at the Google doc when you are done Bob
4. 2021-02-03 13:17 Edward C. Holmes open
   I may have missed this because I can't keep up. In that cast of character mutations how many are true 'immune escape' mutations in that they enable to reinfection of hosts, how many emerged in humans with some sort of partial immune response (e.g. chronic infection), and how many are compensatory/epistatic for other mutations. So, isNellY permissive for EriK? Or is it all of the above?
5. 2021-02-03 13:21 Kristian G. Andersen
   Leif, Karen, and Erik most concerning in that regard - probably...
6. 2021-02-03 13:21 Edward C. Holmes open
   Decent evidence of reinfection?
7. 2021-02-03 14:08 Edward C. Holmes open
   Q2. Is there any decent evidence of selection outside of the spike?
8. 2021-02-03 15:04 Andrew Rambaut open
   L18F came up secondarily in both RSA and UK
9. 2021-02-03 15:04 Andrew Rambaut open
   On the other hand the deletion in nsp6 is in all 3 variants

Full conversation →