COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.467 [SLACK_000681] · slack_pm:msg:04849

Page text: p.467 · original PDF

Date
2021-01-31 15:02
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Kristian G. Andersen, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Robert F. Garry

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

The main reference got that wrong originally and I fell for the trap. I need to update the virological post - which I amplanning on.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2021-01-31 14:58 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Alright - it's 241-243....
  2. 2021-01-31 14:59 Robert F. Garry open
    Actually I think most are 242-244 - few are 241-243 - our chronic patient has 243 and 244.
  3. 2021-01-31 15:01 Kristian G. Andersen open
    As far as I can tell - all are 241-243 ("LLA")
  4. 2021-01-31 15:02 Kristian G. Andersen open
    ... but holy moly, these genomes are messy... Hmmm.
  5. 2021-01-31 15:02 Robert F. Garry
    The main reference got that wrong originally and I fell for the trap. I need to update the virological post - which I amplanning on.
  6. 2021-01-31 15:02 Robert F. Garry open
    Ok now I'm confused...
  7. 2021-01-31 15:04 Andrew Rambaut open
    They (Tulio & co) are using some hokey bioinformatics that initially was very poor at indels.
  8. 2021-01-31 15:04 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Yeah, they're tricky. Definitely LLA (241-243) though - just checked the Danish genomes.
  9. 2021-01-31 15:06 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Here's what I have - I think somewhat accurate, although I'm not convinced some of the other mutations are really there... [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-01-31 at 3.05.48 PM.png]

Full conversation →