COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.467 [SLACK_000681] · slack_pm:msg:04848

Page text: p.467 · original PDF

Date
2021-01-31 15:02
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Kristian G. Andersen

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

... but holy moly, these genomes are messy... Hmmm.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2021-01-31 14:48 Kristian G. Andersen open
    @Andrew Rambaut - do you have a good read on what deletions in the S the B.1.351 lineage has? The original genomes didn't have any, CoVariants lists 242-245, Florian mentioned 242-244, but I see 241-243....
  2. 2021-01-31 14:58 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Alright - it's 241-243....
  3. 2021-01-31 14:59 Robert F. Garry open
    Actually I think most are 242-244 - few are 241-243 - our chronic patient has 243 and 244.
  4. 2021-01-31 15:01 Kristian G. Andersen open
    As far as I can tell - all are 241-243 ("LLA")
  5. 2021-01-31 15:02 Kristian G. Andersen
    ... but holy moly, these genomes are messy... Hmmm.
  6. 2021-01-31 15:02 Robert F. Garry open
    The main reference got that wrong originally and I fell for the trap. I need to update the virological post - which I amplanning on.
  7. 2021-01-31 15:02 Robert F. Garry open
    Ok now I'm confused...
  8. 2021-01-31 15:04 Andrew Rambaut open
    They (Tulio & co) are using some hokey bioinformatics that initially was very poor at indels.
  9. 2021-01-31 15:04 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Yeah, they're tricky. Definitely LLA (241-243) though - just checked the Danish genomes.

Full conversation →