Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.467 [SLACK_000681] · slack_pm:msg:04846

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Actually I think most are 242-244 - few are 241-243 - our chronic patient has 243 and 244.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-01-31 14:01 Robert F. Garry open

Just sent a google drive invite - https://docs.google.com/document/d/17-2hi7-fNsjE44himeCkm1PoZ7_-ncvpxUlhShZzDCU/edit Please send feedback - would be great if all could join but understand any declines or hesitancy. Nothing in stone, including the "tone." There's some decent science hidden there.
2021-01-31 14:17 Edward C. Holmes open

Brill, thanks Bob!! I'll get onto it.
2021-01-31 14:48 Kristian G. Andersen open

@Andrew Rambaut - do you have a good read on what deletions in the S the B.1.351 lineage has? The original genomes didn't have any, CoVariants lists 242-245, Florian mentioned 242-244, but I see 241-243....
2021-01-31 14:58 Kristian G. Andersen open

Alright - it's 241-243....
2021-01-31 14:59 Robert F. Garry

Actually I think most are 242-244 - few are 241-243 - our chronic patient has 243 and 244.
2021-01-31 15:01 Kristian G. Andersen open

As far as I can tell - all are 241-243 ("LLA")
2021-01-31 15:02 Kristian G. Andersen open

... but holy moly, these genomes are messy... Hmmm.
2021-01-31 15:02 Robert F. Garry open

The main reference got that wrong originally and I fell for the trap. I need to update the virological post - which I amplanning on.
2021-01-31 15:02 Robert F. Garry open

Ok now I'm confused...