Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.442 [SLACK_000656] · slack_pm:msg:04569

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

True - would be interesting if some of that got out (doesn't look good for CCDC)

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-01-23 14:40 Andrew Rambaut open

Will these be made public?
2021-01-23 14:46 Edward C. Holmes open

No plans to. They don't directly relate to the paper.
2021-01-23 14:51 Robert F. Garry open

@Andrew Rambaut Agree with this - optimal cleavage might vary depending on multiple factors - cleave in the wrong tissue or wrong time not good. - An optimal cleavage site is RRXRR. Not all X's equal so RRRRR among the best.
2021-01-23 14:52 Edward C. Holmes open

But I can of course use them if necessary.
2021-01-23 14:53 Andrew Rambaut

True - would be interesting if some of that got out (doesn't look good for CCDC)
2021-01-23 14:54 Edward C. Holmes open

Oh no.
2021-01-23 14:57 Robert F. Garry open

Wow.
2021-01-23 14:58 Robert F. Garry open

"Also, do you/we plan to write-up these Virological posts into a paper?" yes - needed! on it.
2021-01-23 15:05 Kristian G. Andersen open

Whoa Eddie - that's pretty scary language in that email.