Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.411 [SLACK_000625] · slack_pm:msg:04252

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Of course not, but it's not about convincing them - it's about producing the most complete scientific picture possible.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-01-16 15:03 Edward C. Holmes open

Yes, all correct.
2021-01-16 15:04 Edward C. Holmes open

Can't see any real point in entering into a debate on this. We just need new data.
2021-01-16 15:05 Kristian G. Andersen open

New data... Hah - I'm sure that'll convince 'em :wink:
2021-01-16 15:07 Robert F. Garry open

All good points. I'm surprised at all the love and comfort given to the conspiracy theorists. Jesse, Relman obviously, now ME. [shared file(s): image.png]
2021-01-16 15:07 Edward C. Holmes

Of course not, but it's not about convincing them - it's about producing the most complete scientific picture possible.
2021-01-16 15:09 Edward C. Holmes open

He forgot 'scientific reasons'.
2021-01-16 15:10 Kristian G. Andersen open

Hah
2021-01-16 15:12 Robert F. Garry open

Not surprising ME a wannabe politician [briefly ran for Senate] and likely pissed of that Biden picked EL for the WHpost.
2021-01-16 15:20 Robert F. Garry open

But, the more I look at RmYN02 and RaTG13 s1/s2 cleavage sites the more I'm convinced that there's a bat CoV out there with at least a very close homolg to SARS FCS already there. QTQTNS plus NSPAAR. Put'em together and what'a you got?