COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, pp.400-401 [SLACK_000614] · slack_pm:msg:04135

Page text: p.400, p.401 · original PDF

Date
2021-01-14 17:02
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Kristian G. Andersen
Topics
Vaccines

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Why they did not stabilize that spike I don't know - so simple, people! If we follow this crackpot theory a little bit, knowing that animals that received the OxAZN vaccine were not protected against infection (at all - vaccinated animals had as much virus as unvaccinated animals in the upper airways after challenge). Could the non-stabilized spike lead to a very narrow immune response with very few epitopes exposed, some of which might be suboptimal?If yes, then presumably the virus might be able to escape immunity quite easily by changing a limited set of amino acids - and, presumably, the same/similar set of AAs.We wouldn't see the same happen in natural infections - more complex to escape. We also wouldn't see the same from other vaccines - because, again, more complex.I don't know if this holds up... Seems like a reach to me - albeit, maybe not impossible?

Extracted statements

Rule-extracted, not adjudicated. The grade says what may be done with each one; read the document above before relying on any of them.

StatementGradeAttributionStance
If we follow this crackpot theory a little bit, knowing that animals that received the OxAZN vaccine were not protected against infection (at all - vaccinated animals had as much virus as unvaccinated animals in the upper airways after challenge). quoted / not their view hypothetical conditional framing asserts
We also wouldn't see the same from other vaccines - because, again, more complex.I don't know if this holds up... own voice, substantive speaker_own asserts

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2021-01-14 16:27 Kristian G. Andersen open
    I'm almost certain they'll have _some_ effect on efficacy, but just not sure how much. Let's hope very little (say, 95%> 92%...)
  2. 2021-01-14 16:27 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Lord knows what the effectiveness is going to be anyway. We'll see...
  3. 2021-01-14 16:31 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Tangential to this, but important to fully understand just how tolerant SARS-CoV-2 is to mutations in immunologicallykey sites - HCoV-NL63 uses ACE2 as a receptor too and is very diverged from SC2. @Robert Garry - I don't know ifyou have looked more closely at that virus going through your alignments / structures?
  4. 2021-01-14 16:56 Robert F. Garry open
    YeaH do think there will be failures for the vaccines that don't use a stabilized spike. Erica Saphire and others have been preaching this, some folks don't listen. Same with Lassa vaccine, but that's an entirely different story. BTW - Iwas on call yesterday with Erica/NIH so I missed several Zooms.
  5. 2021-01-14 17:02 Kristian G. Andersen
    Why they did not stabilize that spike I don't know - so simple, people! If we follow this crackpot theory a little bit, knowing that animals that received the OxAZN vaccine were not protected against infection (at all - vaccinated animals had as much virus as unvaccinated animals in the upper airways after challenge). Could the non-stabilized spike lead to a very narrow immune response with very few epitopes exposed, some of which might be suboptimal?If yes, then presumably the virus might be able to escape immunity quite easily by changing a limited set of amino acids - and, presumably, the same/similar set of AAs.We wouldn't see the same happen in natural infections - more complex to escape. We also wouldn't see the same from other vaccines - because, again, more complex.I don't know if this holds up... Seems like a reach to me - albeit, maybe not impossible?

Full conversation →