COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, pp.333-334 [SLACK_000547] · slack_pm:msg:03508

Page text: p.333, p.334 · original PDF

Date
2020-12-21 13:56
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Edward C. Holmes

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Totally agree. Might be good if DRASTIC were distracted for a while.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2020-12-21 13:52 Edward C. Holmes open
    SO3
  2. 2020-12-21 13:52 Andrew Rambaut open
    We even considered it for a bit
  3. 2020-12-21 13:54 Edward C. Holmes open
    Porton Down does have that bad rap after all
  4. 2020-12-21 13:54 Andrew Rambaut open
    But given the South African outbreak has a very similar pattern I am still going for chronic immunocompromised human (and there are obviously lots in South Africa).
  5. 2020-12-21 13:56 Edward C. Holmes
    Totally agree. Might be good if DRASTIC were distracted for a while.
  6. 2020-12-21 14:04 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Chronic infection seems more likely to me - however, I don't think we can rule out potential epizootic spilling back into humans. But all these mutations certainly look consistent with chronic infection
  7. 2020-12-21 14:05 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Bob, from the paper above - really does seem 501 is a key 'transmission' residue. Of course, 501T has also been observed.
  8. 2020-12-21 14:05 Andrew Rambaut open
    It wouldn't be a simple epizootic - extensive transmission in mink didn't produce more than a few mutations
  9. 2020-12-21 14:06 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Mink > rodents > humans - or some weird shit. But yeah, I agree - not consistent with what has been observedin mink and fully consistent with what has been observed in chronic infections.

Full conversation →