A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it
answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.
-
Just to revisit Baric https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7081895/ "Second, residue 501 in 2019-nCoV RBD (corresponding to residue 487 in SARS-CoV) is an asparagine. Based on our previous structural analysis, residue 487 in SARS-CoV is located near virus-binding hot spot Lys353 (i.e., hot spot 353) on human ACE2 Fig.1C. Hot spot 353 consists of a salt bridge between Lys353 and Asp38 also buried in a hydrophobic environment. In civet SARS-CoV RBD (year 2002), residue 487 is a serine, which cannot provide favorable support for hot spot 353. Inhuman SARS-CoV isolated in year 2002, residue 487 is a threonine, which strengthens the structural stability of hot spot 353. The S487T mutation adds the favorable interaction at the RBD-human ACE2 interface, enhances viral binding to human ACE2, and plays a critical role in the human-to-human transmission of SARS-CoV. In human SARS-CoV isolated in year 2003, residue 487 is a serine and there was no human-to-human transmission for this SARS-CoV strain. Asn501 in 2019-nCoV RBD provides more support to hot spot 353 than Ser487 but less thanThr487. This analysis suggests that 2019-nCoV recognizes human ACE2 less efficiently than human SARS-CoV (year 2002) but more efficiently than human SARS-CoV (year 2003). Hence, at least when considering the ACE2-RBD interactions, 2019-nCoV has gained some capability to transmit from human to human." It's not held uptoo well.
-
Next up: the DRASTIC krewe advances their theory that the UK variant is a lab escape. Don't bother, but this from one of the DRASTIC stars: "Both the S1, the RBM and the FCS of the UK variant show obvious sign of adaptation inmice." Will Alina, Relman Ebright jump on the bandwagon?:exploding_head:
-
It is a way more likely hypothesis than the Wuhan lab in that there is provably SARS-CoV-2 in hundreds of labs doing a thousand different experiments.
-
SO3
-
2020-12-21 13:52
Andrew Rambaut
We even considered it for a bit
-
Porton Down does have that bad rap after all
-
But given the South African outbreak has a very similar pattern I am still going for chronic immunocompromised human (and there are obviously lots in South Africa).
-
Totally agree. Might be good if DRASTIC were distracted for a while.
-
Chronic infection seems more likely to me - however, I don't think we can rule out potential epizootic spilling back into humans. But all these mutations certainly look consistent with chronic infection