COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.302 [SLACK_000516] · slack_pm:msg:03158

Page text: p.302 · original PDF

Date
2020-12-06 12:39
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes
speaker
Andrew Rambaut

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Given we see identical genomes spaced 6 weeks apart, I don't think we need to use imputed dates - just enforce WA1 to be an outgroup

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2020-12-06 12:35 Andrew Rambaut open
    So I think most parsimonious would be `Malaysia/MKAK-CL-2020-6430|EPI_ISL_416886|2020-02-04` -> `WA1` -> `WH04` -> `Wuhan-Hu-1`
  2. 2020-12-06 12:35 Andrew Rambaut open
    (but all in Wuhan)
  3. 2020-12-06 12:36 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Would it be worth trying to simulate a WA1 with a date in the beginning of December and run beast?
  4. 2020-12-06 12:38 Andrew Rambaut open
    shared file(s): image.png
  5. 2020-12-06 12:39 Andrew Rambaut
    Given we see identical genomes spaced 6 weeks apart, I don't think we need to use imputed dates - just enforce WA1 to be an outgroup
  6. 2020-12-06 12:40 Andrew Rambaut open
    By the way - the C16T in WH04 is probably wrong, it is the very first nucleotide of that sequence. Should find abetter canonical lineage A
  7. 2020-12-06 12:44 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Ah, yes - could be wrong. Let me see if I can pull the raw data
  8. 2020-12-06 12:52 Andrew Rambaut open
    I will find a better one - it isn't full length.
  9. 2020-12-06 13:16 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Some cleaner alignments here with better naming, etc. [shared file(s): 2020.12.06_SARS-CoV-2_RaTG13.geneious, 2020.12.06_SARS2_SARS_SARS-like.geneious]

Full conversation →