COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.302 [SLACK_000516] · slack_pm:msg:03155

Page text: p.302 · original PDF

Date
2020-12-06 12:35
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes
speaker
Andrew Rambaut

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

(but all in Wuhan)

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2020-12-06 12:11 Kristian G. Andersen open
    WA1
  2. 2020-12-06 12:27 Andrew Rambaut open
    And by WA1 we mean a haplotype identical to WA1 that was in Wuhan before the 15th January
  3. 2020-12-06 12:33 Andrew Rambaut open
    Curious though that the Malaysian one is one SNP closer to RmYN02 than all the others. So possibly that one (but the January cases in Malaysia were Chinese nationals visiting)
  4. 2020-12-06 12:35 Andrew Rambaut open
    So I think most parsimonious would be `Malaysia/MKAK-CL-2020-6430|EPI_ISL_416886|2020-02-04` -> `WA1` -> `WH04` -> `Wuhan-Hu-1`
  5. 2020-12-06 12:35 Andrew Rambaut
    (but all in Wuhan)
  6. 2020-12-06 12:36 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Would it be worth trying to simulate a WA1 with a date in the beginning of December and run beast?
  7. 2020-12-06 12:38 Andrew Rambaut open
    shared file(s): image.png
  8. 2020-12-06 12:39 Andrew Rambaut open
    Given we see identical genomes spaced 6 weeks apart, I don't think we need to use imputed dates - just enforce WA1 to be an outgroup
  9. 2020-12-06 12:40 Andrew Rambaut open
    By the way - the C16T in WH04 is probably wrong, it is the very first nucleotide of that sequence. Should find abetter canonical lineage A

Full conversation →