Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, pp.299-300 [SLACK_000513] · slack_pm:msg:03127

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

ALL the pangolins have that one - none of the bats

Extracted statements

Rule-extracted, not adjudicated. The grade says what may be done with each one; read the document above before relying on any of them.

Statement	Grade	Attribution	Stance
ALL the pangolins have that one - none of the bats	needs context	speaker_own	asserts

Statement

Grade

Attribution

Stance

ALL the pangolins have that one - none of the bats

needs context

speaker_own

asserts

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2020-12-06 11:10 Kristian G. Andersen open

Haha, historical significance for sure :wink:
2020-12-06 11:11 Kristian G. Andersen open

All of this is very interesting though - isn't this data most consistent with an early divergence (or two emergences)that we didn't capture at the time and that have no connection to the seafood market? In other words - entirely what one might expect?
2020-12-06 11:11 Andrew Rambaut open

Oh - I have just seen what you just said - Malaysia is the same as the Pangolin at 6049 where it differes from WA1
2020-12-06 11:11 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yup
2020-12-06 11:12 Kristian G. Andersen

ALL the pangolins have that one - none of the bats
2020-12-06 11:12 Andrew Rambaut open

It is part of the pangolin which is more divergent than RmYN02
2020-12-06 11:13 Andrew Rambaut open

But seems a weird coincidence given I pulled it out because of the Malaysian/Pangolin connection
2020-12-06 11:13 Andrew Rambaut open

Synonymous though
2020-12-06 11:13 Kristian G. Andersen open

Haha, YES - I thought you had looked at the alignment!