A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it
answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.
-
... I missed that part. I thought it was the Russians - but hey, same thing, right? I can see Alina has gone full-onconspiracy with this too. Good stuff. It'll be hilarious looking back at these tweets in a couple of years.
-
Hah! We have Joel to thank for the China emergence of H1N1 :wink: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0011184
-
(I know he's been working on SARS-CoV-2 to look at origins - interested to see what he comes up with).
-
Somebody had some Twitter correspondence with Jon Cohen and presented all the evidence that 1977 H1N1 was a dodgy vaccine. There was a pretty convincing paper that Jon seemed to buy. I did. I'll see if I can find it.
-
2020-11-18 20:58
Edward C. Holmes
Plus, that Nature Addendum makes all the miners story totally out-of-date.
-
Yeah, 1977 is definitely an escape - and likely linked to vaccine work. I thought in Russia though.
-
This is what I was thinking of: [shared file(s): mBio-2015-Rozo-e01013-15.full.pdf]
-
Suggests is a dodgy vaccine trial NOT an escape.
-
Yup, I read this one when we wrote our paper - it's good. And yes, likely vaccine work, although I'd argue that that's just one type of 'escape'. Never fully proven though, so given all the weirdness we see with Ebola, who knows.