COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.260 [SLACK_000474] · slack_pm:msg:02720

Page text: p.260 · original PDF

Date
2020-11-17 09:13
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Kristian G. Andersen
Topics
Congressional oversightNatural origin / zoonotic spillover

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Yup, I have been hearing you saying this for years - for Ebola too. For SARS we actually got to see some of those mutations because we captured the intermediate host - would be very interesting to see for SARS2 as well, but the mink data is definitely interesting in this regard.

Extracted statements

Rule-extracted, not adjudicated. The grade says what may be done with each one; read the document above before relying on any of them.

StatementGradeAttributionStance
Yup, I have been hearing you saying this for years - for Ebola too. own voice, substantive speaker_own asserts
For SARS we actually got to see some of those mutations because we captured the intermediate host - would be very interesting to see for SARS2 as well, but the mink data is definitely interesting in this regard. quoted / not their view hypothetical conditional framing asserts

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2020-11-17 09:05 Kristian G. Andersen open
    One thing from the preprint I agree about though - and mentioned when I testified in front of the Danish parlamentyesterday "The rapid acquisition and spread of SARS-CoV-2 mutations in minks suggests that if a similarphenomenon of host adaptation had occurred upon its jump into humans, those human-specific mutations would likely have reached fixation already before the first SARS-CoV-2 genomes were generated". That could very likelybe true - ultra fast fixation during the first few rounds of human to human transmission.
  2. 2020-11-17 09:08 Andrew Rambaut open
    Yes. I have been saying that for years. Clear in avian flu too (the same mutations come up). Adaptations to the within-host environment are very rapid. Adaptations to transmission will be much slower. Thus viruses that jump and spread are likely already able to spread but may need some tweaking for within-host growth.
  3. 2020-11-17 09:09 Andrew Rambaut open
    The other thing that virologists struggle with is that better receptor binding does not equal fitter viruses.
  4. 2020-11-17 09:13 Andrew Rambaut open
    But even with the mink, there are lots of lineages in Marion's trees that don't have Y453F.
  5. 2020-11-17 09:13 Kristian G. Andersen
    Yup, I have been hearing you saying this for years - for Ebola too. For SARS we actually got to see some of those mutations because we captured the intermediate host - would be very interesting to see for SARS2 as well, but the mink data is definitely interesting in this regard.
  6. 2020-11-17 09:14 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Yeah, I'm not quite sure what Y453F is about - might just be marginally beneficial.
  7. 2020-11-17 09:15 Andrew Rambaut open
    It appears sufficient times in mink to mean it must be selected for but possibly quite weakly. And possibly as a resultof the high density.
  8. 2020-11-17 09:16 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Yup - plausibly this one becomes fixed when big populations get hit. A lot of diversity in the size of the various farms- especially in Denmark (not sure about NL - but I think they have more 'mega' farms).
  9. 2020-11-17 09:17 Andrew Rambaut open
    Here is a report I wrote for the WHO. To me the most interesting thing is the spike deletion at 69/70 that appears after Y453F and also appears after N469K in humans [shared file(s): Mink-associated_mutations_in_humans.pdf]

Full conversation →