COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.137 [SLACK_000351] · slack_pm:msg:01404

Page text: p.137 · original PDF

Date
2020-08-15 16:07
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes
speaker
Andrew Rambaut

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

I wouldn't trust the basal thing - it has lots of low coverage areas including over quite a few SNPS internal to the outbreak.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2020-08-15 16:00 Andrew Rambaut open
    Perhaps which ever bat colony produced the 2018 outbreak had some latently infected bats but seems less likely.
  2. 2020-08-15 16:01 Andrew Rambaut open
    Probability of it happening in the middle of another outbreak in the same region? Weird
  3. 2020-08-15 16:05 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Yeah, MBK67 is super weird, but I talked to Mike earlier in the week and it sounds like it's basal on the clade - I can't quite suss it out from the tree as it's displayed. If that is the case, then it might not actually be a survivor relapse, but rather a new spill-over from the very same reservoir. Very interesting indeed - let's touch base on it with Mike next week too.
  4. 2020-08-15 16:06 Kristian G. Andersen open
    And yes, from a probability standpoint - two separate outbreaks starting essentially at the same time? Clearly not impossible, but definitely seems risk overall is just up for Ebola - people encroaching on animal habitat I guess.
  5. 2020-08-15 16:07 Andrew Rambaut
    I wouldn't trust the basal thing - it has lots of low coverage areas including over quite a few SNPS internal to the outbreak.
  6. 2020-08-15 16:08 Andrew Rambaut open
    Strong ascertainment bias - EVD will be noticed in that area.
  7. 2020-08-15 16:08 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Ah, okay - I asked Mike if that sequence had any of the human diversity from the previous outbreak and he said no.But if it's a low coverage sample, who knows. Very very interesting (and so messed up...)
  8. 2020-08-15 16:09 Andrew Rambaut open
    I will take another look before our chat.
  9. 2020-08-15 16:10 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Also, interestingly - more cases of vaccinees getting primary Ebola, only to relapse later on after having receivedmAbs... This definitely needs some further looking into.

Full conversation →