Slack / Private Message Drop — page 576
of 1123 pages · Bates SLACK_000790
← p.575 p.577 → · this page in the original PDF · package
produce their Covs at high levels even if you caught then just right . The intermediate hosts/reservoirs, might grow
virus to higher levels (like say civets for SC1), but probably varies a lot from animal to animal like humans . Sick
snotty nose pangolins might have higher loads for their viruses, too. Same apparently true of camels for MERS-CoV.
All these considerations are why no-one's cultured ebola virus from a bat yet.
[2021-03-08 14:54:07]
[Andrew Rambaut]
And if you just out sampling to look for diversity you are probably going to store the samples to preserve RNA rather
than hope to culture anything.
[2021-03-08 14:55:51]
[Robert Garry]
Yes - you might try to get lucky and if your cold chain was good freeze some sample away, but RNA Is the way to go
in most field situations.
[2021-03-08 14:58:49]
[Robert Garry]
But - most likely - screening by culturing is not going to be a sensitive as screening the RNA, if you know what you
are doing with the RNA .
[2021-03-08 14:58:51]
[Eddie Holmes]
We and colleagues do this all the time. The plan is always to get into a cold chain as quick as possible for
sequencing. We do have a portable -80C we use in some cases, but it's usually a case of storage in RNAlater.
[2021-03-08 15:02:25]
[Robert Garry]
In general the RNA (even fragmented non-infectious) hangs a lot longer than any infectious virus.
[2021-03-08 15:04:14]
[Kristian Andersen]
Yeah, culturing viruses from bats or any other animal = bloody hard. I wouldn't be surprised that if you had 50 bats
all infected with SC2, you'd only be able to grow it out of one of those.
[2021-03-08 15:04:38]
[Robert Garry]
Explains some of the problems in the diagnostic space - Start mixing in detection with antigen assays [which
correlates not so well with infectious virus or RNA] and it gets complicated fast.
[2021-03-08 15:06:43]
[Andrew Rambaut]
[thread - ID: 2021-03-08 15:06:43]
But that means these ideas about WIV sampling viruses from the wild and one of the accidentally escapes might be
wrong?
[2021-03-08 15:07:34]
[Kristian Andersen]
I think most of those people underestimate how incredibly hard it is to grow stuff from such samples, yes.
[2021-03-08 15:07:52]
[Robert Garry]
Screening species with serology though I think is the way to go - that is why Lin-Fa's ACE2BOB makes sense - find
the species that have antibodies then trap the hell out of them until you get lucky and hit one at peak viremia/RNA.
[2021-03-08 15:07:57]
[Kristian Andersen]
This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The
Committee's PDF
is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned
text: /api/page/slack_pm/576
Records on this page
| Record | Date | Type | Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| slack_pm:msg:06010 | 2021-03-08 | chat message | 575–576 |
| slack_pm:msg:06011 | 2021-03-08 | chat message | 576 |
| slack_pm:msg:06012 | 2021-03-08 | chat message | 576 |
| slack_pm:msg:06013 | 2021-03-08 | chat message | 576 |
| slack_pm:msg:06014 | 2021-03-08 | chat message | 576 |
| slack_pm:msg:06015 | 2021-03-08 | chat message | 576 |
| slack_pm:msg:06016 | 2021-03-08 | chat message | 576 |
| slack_pm:msg:06017 | 2021-03-08 | chat message | 576 |
| slack_pm:msg:06018 | 2021-03-08 | chat message | 576 |
| slack_pm:msg:06019 | 2021-03-08 | chat message | 576 |
| slack_pm:msg:06020 | 2021-03-08 | chat message | 576 |
| slack_pm:msg:06021 | 2021-03-08 | chat message | 576–577 |