Slack / Private Message Drop — page 293
of 1123 pages · Bates SLACK_000507
← p.292 p.294 → · this page in the original PDF · package
[Robert Garry]
https://mygenomix.medium.com/the-origin-of-sars-cov-2-is-a-riddle-meet-the-twitter-detectives-who-aim-to-solve-it-5
0502"If social media is not your thing and you prefer traditional scientific articles, no worries. Below there's a list of
works authored by people mentioned above, as well as others that I didn't mention: for instance, you will find the first
peer-reviewed paper speculating on the lab origin of SARS-CoV-2, by Dan Sirotkin (Twitter account @Harvard2H);
the fascinating Bayesian analysis by Gilles Demaneuf and Rodolphe de Maistre; the preprint by Daoyu Zhang
(Twitter account @flavinkins), who first questioned the data on pangolin coronaviruses; the lab leak hypothesis
proposed by Anon, which perfectly fits with this detective saga; last but not least, the memorable Medium article
by Yuri Deigin on the gain-of-function experiments that were carried out in Wuhan. So many people were involved,
as you may see, but this should not come as a surprise: science is a collective enterprise, even when you do it on
Twitter."
[2020-12-04 07:49:30]
[Robert Garry]
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2020/12/04/vaccine-ethics-does-continuing-covid-19-trials-put-volunte
ers-risk/6473436002/ This was one reason I advocated for human challenge trials - those in the placebo arm remain
"sitting ducks."
[2020-12-04 08:28:38]
[Andrew Rambaut]
The Wellcome Trust is funding a challenge trial. They have manufactured the virus. I don't which vaccines they
intend to use.
[2020-12-04 09:12:05]
[Robert Garry]
GOOD! A major question that randomized "wild" trials will struggle to answer is whether vaccinees still produce
enough virus to remain infectious if exposed. Contrary to what I thought would be the case we found at Tulane that
virus load had very little impact on whether or not a student was a "spreader." There was not complete sterilizing
immunity in the NHP challenge trials AFAIK. So, you could have a situation where vaccinees are protected against
serious disease, but are still able to transmit the virus to some degree.
[2020-12-04 09:17:10]
[Kristian Andersen]
Damn IgA vs IgG!
As for sterilizing immunity - the animal trials for both the J&J and RNA vaccines were promising on this aspect -
the Oxford vaccine, not at all.
[2020-12-04 09:18:41]
[Andrew Rambaut]
But the RNA vaccines may recombine with your viruses and integrate into your genome and all sorts of things.
[2020-12-04 09:20:26]
[Kristian Andersen]
... and lead to sterilization. Which may not be a bad thing.
[2020-12-04 12:20:42]
[Kristian Andersen]
@Andrew Rambaut I can see you have resorted to only reading The Onion these days. Might not be a bad idea.
[2020-12-04 12:22:01]
[Andrew Rambaut]
Been getting all of my news from the Onion for at least 20 years.
[2020-12-05 06:40:52]
[Robert Garry]
Onion>Fox>Newsmax
This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The
Committee's PDF
is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned
text: /api/page/slack_pm/293
Records on this page
| Record | Date | Type | Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| slack_pm:msg:03050 | 2020-12-04 | chat message | 292–293 |
| slack_pm:msg:03051 | 2020-12-04 | chat message | 293 |
| slack_pm:msg:03052 | 2020-12-04 | chat message | 293 |
| slack_pm:msg:03053 | 2020-12-04 | chat message | 293 |
| slack_pm:msg:03054 | 2020-12-04 | chat message | 293 |
| slack_pm:msg:03055 | 2020-12-04 | chat message | 293 |
| slack_pm:msg:03056 | 2020-12-04 | chat message | 293 |
| slack_pm:msg:03057 | 2020-12-04 | chat message | 293 |
| slack_pm:msg:03058 | 2020-12-04 | chat message | 293 |
| slack_pm:msg:03059 | 2020-12-05 | chat message | 293 |