COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1115 [SLACK_001329] · slack_pm:msg:11640

Page text: p.1115 · original PDF

Date
2022-05-28 04:19
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Kristian G. Andersen, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Robert F. Garry

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Shocking, but true.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2022-05-28 04:19 Robert F. Garry
    Shocking, but true.
  2. 2022-05-28 05:19 Robert F. Garry open
    @Kristian Andersen et al - you might want to go over Worobey2022 one mo' time. It's very much getting there, but still I think the writing could be a bit crisper and punchier - too many words and complex sentences in a few cases. The "In sum" paragraph is [still] redundant IMO.
  3. 2022-05-28 05:20 Robert F. Garry open
    great job on the R2R @Kristian Andersen
  4. 2022-05-28 05:20 Andrew Rambaut open
    I agree that we don't need the summary. The paper is already concise enough.
  5. 2022-05-28 05:23 Robert F. Garry open
    Yeah - plus cutting "in sum" would have the virtue of getting closer to the 4000 word guidance.

Full conversation →