Slack / Private Message Drop — page 1115

[Robert Garry] how many times is it necessary to explain that we examined everything agnostically? [2022-05-27 12:36:24] [Kristian Andersen] Lol - no, I didn't receive anything. It appears Emily never read our paper, nor does she understand the concept of a "draft". Back to school, Emily - then try again. [2022-05-27 12:37:07] [Robert Garry] the dimmest bulb... [2022-05-27 12:37:24] [Kristian Andersen] Not even dim - it's not on at all. Hilarious, really. [2022-05-27 12:38:23] [Eddie Holmes] I can see the headline "Draft Proximal Origins paper was not finalized". Damming. [2022-05-27 19:16:31] [Eddie Holmes] I've blocked her emails but found this in the bin: "Just an update. We're going to publish on Tuesday because of the holiday here in the U.S." [2022-05-27 19:28:09] [Kristian Andersen] Can't wait! :face_with_rolling_eyes: [2022-05-27 19:43:30] [Eddie Holmes] Same old, same old. Who cares. Did you look at that PDF of the emails? What was the point in sending me that? [2022-05-27 19:48:50] [Kristian Andersen] I skimmed through it. The first one mentioned you but the rest looked useless [2022-05-27 20:16:39] [Eddie Holmes] That was it. We considered all theories. [2022-05-28 04:19:40] [Robert Garry] Shocking, but true. [2022-05-28 05:19:22] [Robert Garry] @Kristian Andersen et al - you might want to go over Worobey2022 one mo' time. It's very much getting there, but still I think the writing could be a bit crisper and punchier - too many words and complex sentences in a few cases. The "In sum" paragraph is [still] redundant IMO. [2022-05-28 05:20:39] [Robert Garry]