Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1098 [SLACK_001312] · slack_pm:msg:11442

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

That's my best recollection. Tony said VERY little - Francis even less, if anything. They truly were there to listen.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2022-02-23 12:21 Kristian G. Andersen open

Haha, that's right. I guess maybe this is my chance to cash in if I flip.... Hmmm - sorry guys, I'll have to throw you under the bus too. :man-shrugging::moneybag:
2022-02-23 12:23 Edward C. Holmes open

No worries. I'm just surprised we've not yet been blamed for the invasion of Ukraine
2022-02-23 12:25 Kristian G. Andersen open

Oh, I'm sure we'll hear about that shortly. I'll ping my DRASTIC friends.
2022-02-23 12:41 Robert F. Garry open

Tony's quote is great. He really didn't say much at all and I don't remember any specific questions from him. Francis said even less (Francis was at some sort of party). Jeremy said a few things, but mostly just by way of organization.It was mostly a round robin of the other scientists - starting with Kristian. I talked about the FCS [noting FCSs had been inserted before] and the O-linked glycans, which even at that early date didn't seem engineered. Decidedly amixed set of facts that could swing in a number of different directions with more data. Ron and Marion in particular were pretty outspoken that it had to be natural.
2022-02-23 13:09 Robert F. Garry

That's my best recollection. Tony said VERY little - Francis even less, if anything. They truly were there to listen.
2022-02-23 13:18 Edward C. Holmes open

Sounds accurate to me