Chat message

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

1. 2022-02-23 12:20 Kristian G. Andersen open
   Yeah - some folks on the call asked for odds, but I can't remember whether it might actually have been Jeremy. I'll just say "I don't remember what Tony said"
2. 2022-02-23 12:20 Edward C. Holmes open
   He didn't ask many questions because he spent all his time telling us what to think
3. 2022-02-23 12:21 Kristian G. Andersen open
   Haha, that's right. I guess maybe this is my chance to cash in if I flip.... Hmmm - sorry guys, I'll have to throw you under the bus too. :man-shrugging::moneybag:
4. 2022-02-23 12:23 Edward C. Holmes open
   No worries. I'm just surprised we've not yet been blamed for the invasion of Ukraine
5. 2022-02-23 12:25 Kristian G. Andersen
   Oh, I'm sure we'll hear about that shortly. I'll ping my DRASTIC friends.
6. 2022-02-23 12:41 Robert F. Garry open
   Tony's quote is great. He really didn't say much at all and I don't remember any specific questions from him. Francis said even less (Francis was at some sort of party). Jeremy said a few things, but mostly just by way of organization.It was mostly a round robin of the other scientists - starting with Kristian. I talked about the FCS [noting FCSs had been inserted before] and the O-linked glycans, which even at that early date didn't seem engineered. Decidedly amixed set of facts that could swing in a number of different directions with more data. Ron and Marion in particular were pretty outspoken that it had to be natural.
7. 2022-02-23 13:09 Robert F. Garry open
   That's my best recollection. Tony said VERY little - Francis even less, if anything. They truly were there to listen.
8. 2022-02-23 13:18 Edward C. Holmes open
   Sounds accurate to me

Full conversation →