COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1081 [SLACK_001295] · slack_pm:msg:11258

Page text: p.1081 · original PDF

Date
2022-01-27 17:32
Type
chat message · slack
mentioned
Edward C. Holmes
recipient
Kristian G. Andersen, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Robert F. Garry
Topics
Lab-leak / accidental release hypothesis

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

> Yeah @Eddie Holmes like the: "5. I'll not answer any of your questions if your curiosity is based on the conspiracy of "man made or lab leak of SARS-CoV-2" or some non-sense questions based on your suspicion. No trust, no conversation."

Extracted statements

Rule-extracted, not adjudicated. The grade says what may be done with each one; read the document above before relying on any of them.

StatementGradeAttributionStance
I'll not answer any of your questions if your curiosity is based on the conspiracy of "man made or lab leak of SARS-CoV-2" or some non-sense questions based on your suspicion. quoted / not their view quoted_external inside quotation marks asserts

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2022-01-27 17:32 Robert F. Garry
    > Yeah @Eddie Holmes like the: "5. I'll not answer any of your questions if your curiosity is based on the conspiracy of "man made or lab leak of SARS-CoV-2" or some non-sense questions based on your suspicion. No trust, no conversation."
  2. 2022-01-27 17:48 Edward C. Holmes open
    I enjoyed that one. That Cleary is a total wanker. I responded to an email by him at some point (I forget when) andhe posted it straight on Twitter.
  3. 2022-01-27 17:56 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Blocked him a looooooon time ago on Twitter.

Full conversation →