Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1056 [SLACK_001270] · slack_pm:msg:11031

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Yes - you click on the 'Feb '20' to get the full time stamp

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2022-01-13 13:23 Andrew Rambaut open

shared file(s): image.png
2022-01-13 13:24 Andrew Rambaut open

Need to check if that is the data for the last update.
2022-01-13 13:25 Kristian G. Andersen open

Okay, great - I think David (and others) have this as 2/9 - because of this: [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2022-01-13 at1.24.38 PM.png]
2022-01-13 13:25 Kristian G. Andersen open

The edit history makes it looks as if it's Feb 9 - but it's not, it's Feb 16 (just checked our email chain too)
2022-01-13 13:26 Andrew Rambaut

Yes - you click on the 'Feb '20' to get the full time stamp
2022-01-13 13:26 Kristian G. Andersen open

I have it on wayback machine too: https://web.archive.org/web/20200217170645/https://virological.org/t/the-proximal-origin-of-sars-cov-2/398
2022-01-13 13:27 Andrew Rambaut open

Yeah - the admin can easily and invisibly change the timestamps on Discourse so it shouldn't be used as hard proof
2022-01-13 13:28 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yeah, this is what David has: "This paper went up promptly as a preprint on Virological (notwithstanding Rambaut's preference for pre-preprintruminations) on February 9th, while it made its way through the editorial process more slowly at an important journal" I'll correct him. @Eddie Holmes - if you haven't sent him your edits, can you please include in your edits too?
2022-01-13 13:35 Andrew Rambaut open

`notwithstanding Rambaut's preference for pre-preprint ruminations` ? what is he going on about here?